Readify

Lionel Bengelsdorf's support for Lindbergh and role as Jewish affairs adviser

The Plot Against America

Lionel Bengelsdorf’s alliance with Charles A. Lindbergh joins early political endorsement to a claim of intimate influence: Bengelsdorf argues that his access to the president can make Jewish inclusion part of the administration’s program. The relationship gives the rabbi a prominent role in government and turns his vision of assimilation into policy, but it also makes his assurances a source of acute conflict inside Herman Roth’s family. Its central tension is whether access to power can protect a minority when that power is already distrusted.

Political Basis and Public Promise

Bengelsdorf presents the alliance as a response to the precarious position of Jews in American life. At dinner with the Roth family, he describes American Jews as having an unprecedented opportunity to participate fully in their country rather than remain a separate, stigmatized community. He points to Sandy Roth’s summer as a farm hand in Kentucky through the Just Folks program as an example of the courage and participation he wants other Jewish children and adults to emulate. In his account, the program is not merely his own aspiration: it is also the president’s dream.

The claim makes Bengelsdorf’s political support more than an electoral endorsement. He treats Lindbergh’s presidency as a possible instrument for bringing Jews into the national life that belongs to them, and he presents participation as both a right and a responsibility. For Herman Roth, however, the prospect of inclusion under an administration he fears does not settle the question of safety. The two men disagree not over whether Jewish Americans belong to the country, but over whether Bengelsdorf’s route to belonging is trustworthy.

Bengelsdorf’s Case for Lindbergh

When Herman challenges the president’s policies, Bengelsdorf answers with the authority of personal access. He says he had spoken with Lindbergh at the White House the previous morning and had discussed the suspicion arising from the president’s trips to Germany in the late 1930s. Bengelsdorf portrays those trips as an effort to assess the German air force for the United States government, and says that he has helped Jewish congregants who once voted for Franklin D. Roosevelt become supporters of the administration because it has preserved neutrality and spared the country another major war.

Bengelsdorf does not deny that Lindbergh previously made public remarks grounded in antisemitic clichés. Instead, he characterizes the president as having spoken from ignorance, then changed his understanding through two or three private conversations with the rabbi. He describes Lindbergh as intelligent, courageous, and committed to individual enterprise, and insists that the president has shown no inclination toward dictatorship. The private access at the center of the alliance thus serves as Bengelsdorf’s evidence: he asks the family to trust his account of a leader whose public record has made others suspicious.

He also defends the administration by contrasting its stated policy with the Nuremberg Laws. Those laws, he says, stripped Jews of civil rights and excluded them from their nation; the Office of American Absorption, by contrast, is meant to invite Jews further into American national life. Bengelsdorf frames the difference as fundamental: exclusion in Nazi Germany versus inclusion in the United States. When he asks Herman whether this explanation addresses his fears, Herman answers that it does not and says the rabbi’s defense alarms him further. Their exchange exposes the alliance’s basic limit: Bengelsdorf’s confidence in his influence cannot compel the confidence of the people he hopes to reassure.

From Personal Access to Government Program

Bengelsdorf’s position in the administration reflects Lindbergh’s trust in an early supporter. He becomes director of the Office of American Absorption and the administration’s foremost adviser on Jewish affairs. In Bengelsdorf’s telling, his role allows him to persuade the president to relinquish misconceptions and understand the variety of Jewish life in the United States. The program therefore carries two meanings at once: it is an official means of promoting Jewish participation, and it is the clearest institutional expression of Bengelsdorf’s belief that his political alliance can alter the administration from within.

The alliance also reaches the Roth family directly through Sandy. The summer after Just Folks sends one hundred boys from New Jersey west, Sandy is selected as the state’s recruiting officer. He is to speak to eligible Jewish youngsters and their families about the Office of American Absorption and encourage them to apply. His appointment makes the family’s political division public and practical: Sandy is no longer only a participant in the program but a spokesman for it. Herman experiences the appointment as a consequence of Bengelsdorf’s intervention and influence, while Bengelsdorf’s vision gains a young representative who can help carry it to other families.

Reception, Influence, and Limits

As Lindbergh’s presidency continues, Bengelsdorf’s standing grows among Jewish leaders. The narrative reports that leaders across the country come to acknowledge that he had been prescient in endorsing Lindbergh and that his elevation to the Office of American Absorption followed from having gained the president’s confidence as an early supporter. As neighbors gradually give more weight to Bengelsdorf’s assurances than to Walter Winchell’s warnings, some are willing to attribute the apparent neutralization—or even eradication—of the president’s antisemitism to the rabbi’s influence. The alliance thus acquires a public success story: Bengelsdorf’s endorsement seems vindicated, and his access appears to have produced a change at the center of government.

That success remains contested within the Roth household. Herman refuses the reassurance Bengelsdorf offers, while Sandy’s new work makes the program and its political assumptions part of daily family life. The contrast is not simply between a supporter and an opponent of Lindbergh; it is between Bengelsdorf’s faith in persuasion through proximity to power and Herman’s refusal to treat proximity as proof of safety. The alliance’s significance lies in both its reach and its unresolved risk: it gives Bengelsdorf a channel into the presidency and gives Jewish assimilation an official platform, yet the promise of protection remains an argument, not a consensus.